Workers sew at a garment factory in Yangon on November 1, 2018. (AFP)

Unions file complaints over Myanmar garment production

By AFP

A global union announced yesterday that it had filed complaints against three major clothing brands – Next, New Yorker and LPP – over their alleged continued sourcing of garments from junta-run Myanmar.

The Switzerland-based IndustriALL Global Union said that it and the two banned Myanmar unions Confederation of Trade Unions, Myanmar and Industrial Workers Federation of Myanmar had filed the complaints against the three brands, accusing them of breaching internationally-agreed guidelines for responsible business conduct.

The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development guidelines call, among other things, for multinationals to operate ethically and responsibly regarding human and labour rights, IndustriALL pointed out.

That, it said, was impossible while operating in Myanmar, which has been in turmoil since the military deposed Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s government in February 2021 and launched a crackdown that sparked an armed uprising.

IndustriALL – an umbrella group representing some 50 million workers through more than 600 trade union affiliates – warned in a statement that the textile and garment industry had become an important way for Myanmar’s military rulers to “inject foreign money into a collapsing economy”.

“Meanwhile, Myanmar’s military junta has banned unions and arrested union leaders,” it said, insisting that “there is no freedom of association; unions and other workers’ organisations can’t function”.

Explaining the complaint – filed at OECD national contact points in Britain, Germany and Poland, where the three companies are headquartered, as well as in the Netherlands – it also pointed to reports of serious workers’ rights violations and collapsing wages.

“Brands that stay in Myanmar are benefiting from an environment of fear, forced labour, and exploitation,” IndustriALL general secretary Mr Atle Hoie said in the statement.

“There are widespread, comprehensive reports on the extensive violations of workers’ rights,” he said.

“Human rights due diligence requires worker involvement and independent verification, which is impossible under the military rule.”

IndustriALL is campaigning for brands to disinvest from Myanmar.

In 2022, discussions it held with several large garment brands concluded with an agreement on the responsible disengagement from the southeast Asian country, which so far has been followed by the likes of H&M, Primark and Lidl.

“There is significant evidence of systemic violations of workers’ rights and brands that remain in Myanmar cannot claim ignorance of the abuses,” Hoie said.

“Brands that stay prioritise profits over human and workers’ rights,” he said, adding that the union was considering more complaints against the brands remaining in Myanmar.

More stories

Latest Issue

Stories in this issue
Myanmar enters 2021 with more friends than foes
The early delivery of vaccines is one of the many boons of the country’s geopolitics, but to really take advantage, Myanmar must bury the legacy of its isolationist past.
Will the Kayin BGF go quietly?
The Kayin State Border Guard Force has come under intense pressure from the Tatmadaw over its extensive, controversial business interests and there’s concern the ultimatum could trigger fresh hostilities in one of the country’s most war-torn areas.

Support our independent journalism and get exclusive behind-the-scenes content and analysis

Stay on top of Myanmar current affairs with our Daily Briefing and Media Monitor newsletters.

Sign up for our Frontier Fridays newsletter. It’s a free weekly round-up featuring the most important events shaping Myanmar