Myanmar peace discussions need to be more rights-focused and inclusive

Grassroots and civil society organisations need to have a stake in the 21st Century Panglong Conference for the peace process to be a success. 

By YANGHEE LEE & RHIANNON PAINTER | FRONTIER

On August 31 Myanmar will hold its “21st Century Panglong Conference” – the latest step in the country’s long peace process. It will be a moment imbued with symbolism. General Aung San, Aung San Suu Kyi’s own father led the Bamar delegation at the first Panglong conference held in 1947, which reached a breakthrough agreement with three armed groups and is still etched in the popular memory of the country today.

A lot is at stake with this Panglong Conference. As with the peace process generally in Myanmar, this is the opportunity to transform the country, into a state that the people of Myanmar have wanted for several decades. But to do so it must be fully inclusive.

Getting all of the ethnic armed organisations to the table is a major challenge in itself. There still remain 3 groups, still in active combat, that were excluded from discussions on the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) and how they will participate in the Panglong Conference is still confusing. There has been much focus on the inclusion of these groups and this is important, especially given human rights violations which are particularly prevalent in areas of continuing conflict.

But inclusivity is more than just about political players but is also about all stakeholders. Experiences in other countries have shown time and time again the need for women to play an equal part, for grassroots organisations and civil society to have a strong voice and for information to be freely available for the people to follow developments. These are the ingredients for a sustainable inclusive process which can propel the country forward and into the prosperous future for all.

Support more independent journalism like this. Sign up to be a Frontier member.

Unfortunately, during our recent visit to Myanmar we saw signs that the peace process risks neglecting these fundamental aspects. Myanmar has only a week before the Panglong Conference and quick changes should be made to ensure these vital aspects are addressed.

Studies have shown the involvement of women in peace process increases the likelihood of an enduring agreement. Whilst the NCA contained several important provisions on issues related to women, Myanmar in general has not performed well so far on this score, with women comprising only 16% of the senior delegation negotiating the NCA. Unfortunately, so far there are little signs of this improving as the new government has not confirmed the commitment made by the previous one to guarantee at least 30% female representation.

Governments come and go, all with their own priorities and agendas. We have found that it is the CSOs that have the institutional knowledge of the historical context of problems and various methods to address them. It is the CSOs and grassroots organizations that are at the front line seeing and experiencing the actual situation of a community.

Oftentimes, they are the only ones that address important issues of both marginalized and mainstream society that Governments either avoid, or fail to address, or sometimes do not have the capacity or will to address the very important human rights issues at hand. Therefore, it is imperative that an environment be established for a vibrant civil society to thrive.

CSOs in Myanmar have played a vital role in conflict areas, supporting, empowering and aiding populations and as such have a unique insight and must be involved in all aspects of the peace process.

During our recent visit to Myanmar civil society told us that there is a reluctance to allow them to be involved in peace process issues deemed “political”, despite the fact that many of these areas have a direct link to human rights concerns. We have been assured civil society will have a central role in the process and there will be a “Civil Society Organisations’ Peace Forum” but this process is not totally clear.

It is vital that CSOs be allowed input on all areas including those related to security or politics. On the other hand, it had been announced that political parties which did not win seats at the recent elections will be part of the CSO forum, and not the conference itself. CSOs and political parties are fundamentally different organisations. Blurring the lines in this way will undermine the important role that both have to play.

Youth, as the future of the country, must also play a role, and we were disappointed to hear comments from senior individuals that the outcomes of the recent ethnic youth summit will not be considered in the process. But the young people themselves must also remember the importance of inclusivity not just amongst armed groups but within all communities – it was thus disappointing to see two individuals of ‘mixed heritage’ excluded from full participation in the youth summit. Hopefully in the future, lessons will be learned from this.

Underlying the decades of conflict is basic human rights issues linked to discrimination and minority rights, land rights and a host of others. Addressing these issues in the peace process will be key to building a new Myanmar. But the extent to which these key issues will feature in discussions also remains unclear.

So far, with Panglong just around the corner, there is little clarity on the exact process that will be followed. There has been a failure to inform the public and, more importantly, affected communities of the important details that will be central to the success of the process. Information must be released on the areas discussed above and others, and plans must be communicated to the public to build all important buy-in amongst stakeholders.

The Panglong Conference will just be a first step, but it is an important one. As such, it is vital that human rights concerns are fully integrated, not just in discussions but also in the process – the build-up and make-up of the conference. Myanmar has an opportunity to showcase how a peace process should be done. Fixing these vital areas before the 21st Century Panglong Conference is both possible and would pay dividends in future progress.

Professor Yanghee Lee is the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar. Rhiannon Painter is Assistant to the Special Rapporteur.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

More stories

Latest Issue

Stories in this issue
Myanmar enters 2021 with more friends than foes
The early delivery of vaccines is one of the many boons of the country’s geopolitics, but to really take advantage, Myanmar must bury the legacy of its isolationist past.
Will the Kayin BGF go quietly?
The Kayin State Border Guard Force has come under intense pressure from the Tatmadaw over its extensive, controversial business interests and there’s concern the ultimatum could trigger fresh hostilities in one of the country’s most war-torn areas.

Stay on top of Myanmar current affairs with our Daily Briefing and Media Monitor newsletters

Our fortnightly magazine is available in print, digital, or a combination beginning at $80 a year

Sign up for our Frontier Fridays newsletter. It’s a free weekly round-up featuring the most important events shaping Myanmar